Conference & Posters
Posters present research visually for conference display with concise text and graphics.
Posters present research visually for conference display with concise text and graphics.
When to select this type
Choose Poster when publishing a conference poster with archival value.
Typical audience
Conference attendees and collaborators.
Recommended use cases
Purpose
Share preliminary or completed research in visual conference format.
Scope
Poster PDFs and associated metadata for conference presentations.
Typical structure
Required sections
Recommended sections
Figures
Poster layout as primary visual (1 PDF).
Tables
Embedded in poster.
References
5–15 key references.
Supplementary material
Extended abstract, handout, dataset links.
Required metadata
Required declarations
Funding requirements
Declare funding on poster.
Conflict of interest
Include COI statement on poster.
Ethics requirements
Required for human subjects work.
Consent requirements
Required for identifiable images or data.
Data availability
Link to extended materials when available.
AI disclosure
Disclose AI-generated figures or text.
Copyright
Authors retain copyright.
Licensing
Platform or open license.
Export formats supported
No specific reporting guideline is required, though field standards may still apply.
Typical journal expectations
Readable at print size, high-resolution figures, conference details.
Typical peer review process
Light editorial review for conference attribution and ethics.
Journal compatibility notes
Poster repositories and conference archives.
Submission readiness checklist
Select Poster when your manuscript matches the scope, structure, and reporting expectations described on this page. If your work fits a different scholarly format, review similar publication types before submitting.
Contact the editorial team before payment if you need to change publication type. After editorial screening begins, type changes require editorial approval and may restart parts of the review process.
Reporting guidelines listed as recommended should be followed when applicable to your study design. Editorial reviewers assess completeness against the expectations for your selected publication type.
Platform standards for ethical research publication.
Transparent, ethical, and accountable AI use across research and publishing.
Transparency, independence, and responsible disclosure across research and publishing.